Often on ATAPI raid controllers some of the raid details are not configurable, 64kb is a safe bet. 0 LVL 32 Overall: Level 32 Storage 9 Storage Software 4 Message Back to top Back to Windows XP Home and Professional 0 user(s) are reading this topic 0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users Reply to quoted postsClear BleepingComputer.com → Microsoft It took Windows forever to load, and disk-intensive tasks ran like molasses in January. Join & Ask a Question Advertise Here Enjoyed your answer? Source
Preview this book » What people are saying-Write a reviewWe haven't found any reviews in the usual places.Selected pagesTable of ContentsIndexContentsIntroducing Windows XP Home Edition 11 Getting Your Hardware and Software As soon as the conversion completed for me my performance was back to FAT32 levels. SFNL reader Rob Wilen sent me a simple but very good question. When the analysis is complete, click the View Report button.
I had no idea I was about to touch off an avalanche of questions and reveal a large problem for Windows XP users. Storage Software Microsoft Windows 10 PC Backup Software Acronis Configuring Backup Exec 2012 for VMware Image Level Backups Video by: Rodney This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary Once you have Paragon Partition Manager running, select the NTFS drive whose clusters you want to convert. When all the files were copied and the changes made, it was immediately apparent to me that my performance eroded markedly.
Overnight might be a good idea. He's got PartitionMagic 7, Windows XP, and an NTFS partition that he notices has 512-byte clusters. This occurs because of the way the data is aligned on the disk and the NTFS conversion process as carried out by Microsoft's Convert utility. Eggett says that most NTFS conversions result in 512-byte cluster sizes, but some result in 4K cluster sizes.
If I've helped you, then I must be a volunteer. I'll tell you upfront that there are two problems with this product. The other disk is a Highpoint RAID controller set for RAID 0 and with two 200 GB disks attached. I was ready to try Paragon Partition Manager.
Microsoft's David Golds sent word that the NTFS article in the last issue was accurate except on one point. Special Edition Using Microsoft Windows XP Home, 3rd Edition has been updated to include Service Pack 2 features and coverage of Windows XP Media Center. That's the smallest cluster size NTFS allows. Once I recover the laptop data, I'll be able to say how many.
No, create an account now. Performance is sluggish. It is also able to convert from FAT/FAT32 to NTFS and back. The solution is to convert the cluster sizes to at least 4K.
PowerQuest uses the same underlying tool in PartitionMagic that Microsoft uses in Windows XP to convert FAT32 to NTFS. this contact form Short URL to this thread: https://techguy.org/482673 Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Google Your name or email address: Do you already have an account? Are you prepared? It's also not warning people not to convert to NTFS on Windows 9x upgrades, which routinely result in 512-byte cluster sizes.
But I wanted to let you know they existed if you want to do your own research. As the cluster size reduces, the number of I/O transactions per volume of data will increase, so performance will fall away, 512 byte allocation units being the worst.I can't think of Jeff confirms that Partition Commander can't covert NTFS cluster sizes in it current version either. have a peek here Many, many people have reported that doing so solved their performance problems completely.
My question is whether I am using the "right" approach to maximize disk performance with large files or whether I should do something different? Click here to join today! Namaste, Peace & Love,GlennIf I have frustrated you, then I must be a student.
The surprising truth is that some new PCs also arrive with 512-byte cluster sizes. It's also more reliable. I had no idea I was about to touch off an avalanche of questions and reveal a large problem for Windows XP users. Is this the type of situation leading you to consider small clusters?
The time factor thing is variable. File sizes normally vary randomly, so the average lost space will be the number of files multiplied by half the cluster size. Staff Online Now flavallee Trusted Advisor Advertisement Tech Support Guy Home Forums > Operating Systems > Windows XP > Home Forums Forums Quick Links Search Forums Recent Posts Members Members Quick http://webwonder.net/xp-home/xp-home-over-top-of-win-98.php When properly installed, NTFS under XP is greatly preferable to FAT32.
This isn't just a Windows XP problem, either. I haven't been able to find that information using the tools Microsoft provided (but if you know a way, please send it on and I'll print it next time). Stay logged in Sign up now! Golds writes: "4K clusters are actually close to optimal for performance for most workloads.
I was ready to try Paragon Partition Manager. underlying reality. It is also able to convert from FAT/FAT32 to NTFS and back. The second is that before you make the cluster size change, block out several hours of time for your PC.
I had an existing drive containing a clean Windows 98 Second Edition installation on my trusty Compaq Armada 700 (the best Compaq product I've ever worked with) notebook PC. I also converted to NTFS. NTFS Allocation size for formatting Started by RevGAM , May 02 2012 04:04 PM Please log in to reply 7 replies to this topic #1 RevGAM RevGAM Members 677 posts OFFLINE If I get that, I will try it and write about it in a future issue.
This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. All rights reserved. What makes it different from most other disk-partitioning utilities is that it can dynamically convert cluster sizes under NTFS. The optimum size is 4K clusters.
I won't go into a long explanation, but it's also the slowest cluster size. Back to top BC AdBot (Login to Remove) BleepingComputer.com Register to remove ads #2 Platypus Platypus Moderator 8,795 posts OFFLINE Gender:Male Location:Australia Local time:12:35 AM Posted 02 May 2012 Microsoft is aware of the problem, but really hasn't done much about it.